Programme  Poster session 3  abstract 679

The Development of a Roadmap for Stakeholder Participation in the Orange-Senqu River Basin Commission – an alternative approach

Author(s): Daniel Malzbender , Anton Earle, Chris Brown, Felix Monggae, Barbara Tapela, Motlatsi Mokhothu
The authors were all part of a regional team who worked with the ORASECOM to develop a stakeholder participation strategy for the commission.

Keyword(s): River Basin organisation, stakeholder participation, transboundary water governance, Orange-Senqu River, strategy

Get Adobe Reader

Session: Poster session 3

involvement of stakeholders in river basin management is recognised as an important component of good governance

at all scales, including internationally shared rivers. The Orange-Senqu River Commission (ORASECOM) has

recently concluded the development of a strategy for stakeholder involvement in the management of the basin. This

process was based on intensive collaboration between the Commission, regional water professionals and an

international development partner. Following a brief introduction to stakeholder participation in transboundary water

management, the core section of the paper describes the process of developing a “roadmap for stakeholder

participation in the Orange_Senqu River Basin” and key elements of the roadmap itself. The most important is that it

was decided to move away from the usually practised consultant driven approach, where a consultant develops a

highly polished product but little ownership by the Commission is achieved. Instead, it was decided to follow a

participatory approach to strategy development that would involve the Commission and its task teams throughout the

process of strategy development. The Commission members worked together with other resource persons to define

the core elements of the strategy, forming a first draft document. This draft was further developed by selected

regional resource-persons, representing each basin state, as well as a few other countries, drawn from regional

research organisations, NGOs and the private sector. This resulted in the first full draft of the “road map towards

stakeholder participation”. Following another workshop, where ORASECOM’s technical task team provided

further input to the draft, the draft was revised and finalised and has been adopted by ORASECOM. The

terminological shift away from a “strategy” to a “roadmap” is significant as it implies a change in the approach to

bringing stakeholders on board. Whereas a strategy lays out a predetermined plan to be implemented as is, the

roadmap identifies a framework for actions in which stakeholders are progressively brought on board and have a say

in determining the nature and level of their involvement. In its final section the paper will conclude with a summary of

lessons learnt from the roadmap development process and the benefits derived from it.

  Return up