Programme OS6j Urban and regional water
conservation and reuse
Urban wastewater reuse for landscape irrigation in a seaside resort:
Author(s): Eric Blin, Philippe Blatière, François Brissaud
Blin, SDEI, route de Bessan, BP 86, 34340 Marseillan, France. E-mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
Blatière, Communauté de Communes Terre de Camargue, 13 rue du Port, 30220 Aigues Mortes, E-mail:
Session: OS6j Urban and regional water
conservation and reuse
Due to recent droughts, increasing public awareness of water being a
limited resource and to ever more stringent requirements on the disposal of wastewater treatment effluents, many
municipalities are planning to reuse municipal wastewater. Protecting bathing places, shellfish farms and sensitive
receiving water bodies has led to the implementation of tertiary wastewater treatments, the cost of which
municipalities would like to recover through treated water reuse for the irrigation of landscaped and recreational
areas. However inappropriate or too strict regulations may hamper the development of water reuse, which would
result in a waste of fresh water resource.
The investigation aims at evaluating the health related risks due to
sprinkler irrigation of urban landscaped areas with the effluents of Le Grau du Roi wastewater treatment plant
(WWTP). Based on the microbial quality of the effluents, the appropriateness of the current French regulations,
which prohibits spraying treated wastewater in the vicinity of houses, buildings, roads and recreational areas
whatever the quality of the treated water, will be assessed and adaptations of the regulations suggested.
Grau du Roi, 100,000 p.e. WWTP, encompasses an activated sludge system achieving high dephosphatation,
nitrification and denitrification, and a 20 hectares waste stabilization pond system. The microbial quality of the
WWTP effluents was monitored from April to September 2006. Effluents of the activated sludge facility and the
ponds were analysed for faecal contamination indicators, E. coli and Streptococci, helminth eggs, Salmonella,
enteroviruses, Legionella spp and Legionella pneumophila.
Faecal indicator bacteria were efficiently removed
from the very outlet of primary ponds. Effluents of the waste stabilization pond system complied with the “excellent
quality” criteria defined by the European Directive 2006/7/EC (EC, 2006) for coastal bathing waters. Helminth eggs,
salmonellae and enteroviruses were never detected neither in the ponds nor at the outlet of the activated sludge
treatment. Legionella spp content was found to be slightly higher or of the order of magnitude of contents often
observed in river waters, e.g. the Rhône water. Legionella pneumophila was detected in the activated sludge
effluents, several times at the outlet of primary ponds and in April only at the outlet of the ponds system using PCR
method; however, contents were not high enough for quantification. Regarding this criterion, effluents of the WWTP
did not differ from the Rhône water.
The microbial quality of the effluents of the waste stabilization pond
system appeared to be virtually pathogen free and, whatever the criterion considered, similar to the quality of the
Rhône water which is currently used for spray irrigation of the green spaces of the resort. Therefore, substituting
waste stabilization pond effluents to Rhône River water is unlikely to alter health risks related to spray irrigation. In
this particular situation, enforcing a buffer zone seems to be short of rational support. Adding a chlorination of pond
effluents is envisaged in order to secure the microbial quality of the irrigation water.